Dear Sir Keir Starmer PM & UK Parliament,
This correspondence presents a comprehensive report related to UK Gov’t and Parliament’s domestic & international commitment to child protection, and prevention of crimes against children. I have omitted reference to online crimes against children and CSA issues associated with the ‘Dark Web’, as this is a specialist area which nonetheless, urgently requires extensive research & investigation in order to formulate appropriate protocols & legislation.
Organised crimes against children involving child trafficking, sexual abuse/CSA and child sexual exploitation/CSE, are a crime against humanity – committed by a unified force of consciousness which includes powerful, famous and professional people who seek illicit & sadistic ‘thrills’ and, have infinite resources at their disposal: In contrast, our children as potential victims, are generally poor, powerless, and entirely dependent on the sane side of the adult world, to protect and prevent crimes against them:
To deny that combatting CSA is an issue of national security, is also, to discriminate against children in or entering into Britain, by failing to appreciate that the extensive and accumulative damages which, CSA predators are highly motivated to inflict with impunity, amount to a co-ordinated and conspiratorial terrorist threat against the psychological, physical & emotional welfare of Britain, as a thriving, living democracy that upholds human rights & honours international law.
According to the evidence accumulated to date, Individual & organised CSA has increased exponentially with every passing year: A report commissioned by UK MPs in 2013, concluded that organised child sexual abuse is “widespread throughout England” and, that child protection authorities are “divorced from reality“. The Commons’ Communities and Local Government Committee called for a ‘review of child protection systems across the country’:
‘Their report said: “On the evidence we took, the alarming conclusion is that Rotherham was not an outlier and that there is a widespread problem of organised child sexual exploitation in England.”
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-south-yorkshire-30083835
2013 was the same year, that yourself Sir Starmer PM, as then Director of Public Prosecutions, published the new UK Child Protection ’Guidelines’ almost as soon as it became mandatory in sync with EU & UN Child-Protection-Directives/CPDs, for police to promptly arrest CSA suspects and seize phones, PC’s & laptops.
Included in the guidelines is your much-celebrated ‘Credibility Clause’ and;
‘A joint protocol for information sharing in child sexual abuse cases has also been published alongside the guidelines, in which police and prosecutors are expected to share information with social services, schools and family courts.’
You described your new directives as ‘the biggest shift for a generation’ via BBC News: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24555303
Involvement of schools, social services & family courts as part of initial CSA investigations, is far from ideal in current social circumstances where organised & individual CSA predators are known to have been employed, and continue to find employment in such places, or else staff, are predisposed toward protecting suspects as fellow abusers or trusted colleagues i.e. ‘Institutional CSA’ is not accounted for under present UK CP Guidelines:
‘A key feature of the dynamics of institutional CSA is the behaviour of the institution itself, both in failing to prevent the abuse and in its response to disclosure. The trauma of the abuse is frequently compounded by responses from people associated with the institution, who find it impossible to believe that such abuse can have occurred or who deny the abuse in order to protect the institution (IICSA Research Team, 2017). Disclosures from survivors have frequently been met with denial, concealment and victim-blaming by institutions seeking to protect themselves from litigation or loss of reputation (Spröber et al, 2014). This institutional behaviour can re-victimise survivors and traumatise them further (Astbury, 2013).’
As the previous and following points will show, your guidelines provide a loophole for abusers employed in police & local-authorities/LAs and thereby, covertly offer an investigation-free safe-zone to predators, thus attracting more of that criminal-type into those professions and who thereafter, are at liberty to invite others of same ilk and/or connect for purpose of organised crime e.g. Abusing position & authority to identify and conspire to procure prospective victims, and also, to control & silence victims who disclose.
London is a popular global destination for trafficked and unaccompanied children – thousands arriving there each year. The majority of those children particularly the very young, land in care of abusers who exploit them as slaves for sex, sadistic ‘fantasy’, and/or labour. The UK public provides income for many abusers via State Benefits; children are then groomed here before being sold to Pimps in e.g. Bangkok.
‘BANGKOK: …I knew I would encounter sex tourists: it is what I’ve been investigating for my next book. But I hadn’t expected to meet a child from Africa with a London accent on the streets of Thailand.
‘Grace explains she was brought from Nigeria to Britain where she was moved from house to house. Then, after two years, she was flown to Bangkok.
‘She works the streets under the watchful gaze of a pimp because even in the hypocrisy of Thailand she would be too young for the main sex bars.’
*Richard Hoskins via Daily Mail:
*Richard Hoskins is a criminologist, with expertise in African ritual crime. He was called upon by the Metropolitan Police Service to work as an expert witness in the Torso in the Thames case. Richard’s account of his involvement in the case, The Boy in the River became a Sunday Times bestseller. He has since been called as an expert witness in over a hundred criminal cases, including numerous high-profile murders, such as those of Victoria Climbié, Jodi Jones and the Eric Bikubi and Magalie Bamu case.
https://thesohoagency.co.uk/experts/richard-hoskins/
Child Protection agencies can quickly become corrupt e.g. Social Services have access to very vulnerable children and babies, have power to legitimise abusers as ‘foster carer’ or ‘guardian’ etc., and, hand children into their custody, as well as, organise child benefits: By today’s reckoning, according to studies from 2012-2013, over 200 babies under age of 1, are disappearing from Social Services records each year. When it comes to children age 2-18 the ‘missing’ amount to thousands – and nobody held to account:
‘‘Analysis of data shared with Newsweek shows that, according to the Department of Education’s statistics for the year ending March 31, 2013, around 1,910 children (legally defined as under the age of 18) left the care system in England for unknown reasons, including 180 babies under the age of one. In the same period in 2012, about 2,260 children left the system for unknown reasons…’
http://europe.newsweek.com/thousands-missing-children-care-system-could-be-sexually-exploited-311607
Why were no further studies done to investigate and address this serious issue of missing cared-for children which also, has been highlighted by an ECPAT Report expressing concern that trafficked children especially, are disappearing from UK care at an ‘alarming rate’?
Nearly 450 refugee children disappear from asylum hotels in UK
Child trafficking victims disappearing from UK care at ‘alarming’ rate
78% of identified trafficked children in the UK during 2023, were British nationals signifying that internal child trafficking is a deeply entrenched social problem that does also, vastly facilitate trafficking children from abroad often, via connections to women’s & child charities in e.g. Africa.
‘Safeguarding professionals must have access to clear and consistent guidance – to help them identify child victims of modern slavery.’
https://www.ecpat.org.uk/Handlers/Download.ashx?IDMF=3000811a-60bd-491e-88d2-3201080a2163
How many UK-national trafficked children were previously in state-care? How many of those were targeted by CSA complicits employed within UK police & LAs? Does anyone in UK authorities really want to know? Is it not presently all too easy to bury such questions within the realms of secrecy under governance of Britain’s family courts?
Numerous UK citizens have suffered arrest, seizure of property, gagging-orders and even incarceration, in their efforts to raise public awareness and/or appeal for help in relation to concerns for the safety & welfare of cared for children; under guise of defending a child’s lawful right to privacy, all other details of CSA cases and associated concerns, under jurisdiction of Family Courts, are also slapped with secrecy orders making it virtually impossible for anyone to address genuine lawful suspicion – in all cases, suspect authorities are left to investigate themselves:
‘A new gagging order is being used against parents and Children, under “Social Services” supervision:
* Under the guise of protecting the Child.
The new order makes it illegal for parents and Children both in or out of the care system:
To talk about or allege, Maltreatment or Abuse.
* It also makes it illegal for anyone to tell you that they are Gagged.
Considering the record of Failures by “Social Services” and the record of endemic Abuse of Children in the “Social Services” Care system.
One has to ask one self “Who is protecting Who?”
*This new legislation breaches just about every Article of the “Human Rights Act” “Rights of a Child Act”. To which this Country alleges to adhere:’
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/family_courts_gagging_orders#comment-68493
Disturbingly, such gagging orders, now ostensibly titled “Transparency Orders” also extend to cared-for adults:
Gagged – in whose best interests?
Gagging Orders: All You Need To Know
The UK CPS needs legal resource & leeway, to weigh up lawfully evidenced CSA concerns, as well as public interest alongside public health & safety, against individual, FC & Police requests for gagging orders. It is a criminal offence to silence genuine concerns for child safety.
Child trafficking, CSA and organised abuse of children are prevalent criminal offences, and yet, arrest & conviction rates of abusers remain – in the words of United Nations Child Protection Committee; ‘extremely low across the state party’.
Child sexual abuse in 2022/23: Trends in official data:
‘Child protection data in 2022/23 Across the year, local authority children’s services in England recorded concerns about child sexual abuse in 33,760 assessments of children; this is 1% fewer than in 2021/22. Two fifths of these recorded concerns related to harmful sexual behaviour by a child. Concerns about child sexual exploitation (which, despite being a form of child sexual abuse, is treated separately in these assessments) were recorded in 15,020 assessments: an 8% decrease on the previous year. There has been a steady decline in the number of assessments recording child sexual exploitation concerns, with nearly 5,000 fewer in 2022/23 than five years earlier. Combined, one in 10 assessments undertaken by local authorities in England recorded a concern about some form of child sexual abuse.’
It is especially disturbing that recorded CSA cases dropped again during 2022-2023 after CSA-related prosecutions had already halved during 2020-2021, when we know for certain that CSA rates are increasing and not decreasing:
‘Child sexual abuse prosecutions and convictions roughly halve in 4 years’
‘Prosecutions for CSA in England and Wales have more than halved from 6,394 in 2016/17 to 3,025 in 2020/21, while convictions dropped by 45% from 4,751 to 2,595 over the same period.’
The natural conclusion is that the current system of UK Child Protection Directives/CPDs are failing; could that be directly due to involvement of family courts, social services & schools etc, for every CSA crime report i.e. Children and parents are afraid that under scrutiny of school, police & LAs, the child will be removed from the family home/’arrested’ regardless of the fact that the reported CSA, has nothing to do with the custodial parent supporting their crime report – usually, the mother – or else, CSA cases are closed within the realms of Family Courts decisions which are regularly based on hearsay and on unevidenced professional opinions?
Family courts/FCs are notoriously discriminatory against women and children reporting domestic abuse and/or CSA, and there are many cases where children were forced to live with, or continue contact with an abusive parent.
It appears the general consensus within FCs, is that accused fathers are ‘commonly’, ‘victims of malice’ by disgruntled mothers, and while that may sometimes be true, it’s alarming at just how much evidence and witness-victim testimony can be casually dismissed by the FCs precisely because, they do not operate as regular courts in terms of judging via trial & jury where evidence is scrutinised.
UK FCs are literally, a law unto themselves – important evidence is easily ignored and disturbingly, many abusive parents are not only left unprosecuted by the state but instead, are granted contact with the child/ren they abused.
The ‘dozens’ referred to in the BBC news link below are very probably, a mere sample of such cases when we put that figure in context of CSA, and especially organised CSA where victims are controlled & coerced into silence by multiple, often socially powerful people.
The most disturbing aspect of the aforementioned ‘gagging-orders’ on CSA, is that witnesses are forced to turn to other organisations and rely on e.g. A BBC investigation, to highlight the issue. All of this takes time – valuable time during which, children are left at risk and/or to suffer continued abuse, when prompt action is vital:
Family courts: Children forced into contact with fathers accused of abuse:
‘Dozens of children have been forced into contact with fathers accused of abuse, a study has found.
‘In some cases in the research, revealed for the first time by the BBC, the fathers were convicted paedophiles. In all cases, fathers had used a disputed concept in court known as “parental alienation”.
‘Separately, the same concept has been cited in the deaths of women after family courts allowed fathers accused of abuse to apply for contact.
‘The BBC investigation found five mothers died – some taking their own lives and one having a heart attack.’
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-66531409
UK police & Local Authorities/LAs seem oblivious to the lawful reality that ensuring a child’s human rights to safety overrides their rights to privacy. If this were not the case, then widely published images and details of missing children would be prohibited, and it is noticeable that no such details, images or any publicity at all, is given to missing cared-for children, whom it appears, are denied their human rights in favour of defending their privacy:
“People are paid to care for you” | Why missing from care rates are so high
https://www.missingpeople.org.uk/missing-from-care
When Harm Remains: An update report on trafficked and unaccompanied children going missing from care in the UK
‘Local authority Children’s Services must improve data recording systems. They should collect and hold data on each child’s history and risk of trafficking. This is in addition to recording it on a child’s individual care plan and in any assessments. This trafficking flag should be in a reportable format, allowing for easy analysis, monitoring and to facilitate multi-agency safeguarding action.’
Why is there a national database for missing cars but none for missing children?
The most deeply disturbing and truly dangerous aspect of Sir Starmer PM’s guidelines is the ‘Credibility Clause’/CC i.e. Police are told to prioritise the credibility of children’s crime reports over whether or not a child makes a “good witness”.
Firstly; who can determine what is credible or incredible when it comes to abuse against children when that crime itself, is an incredible and abhorrent act to the social majority? And, when we know without doubt that the most ‘incredible’ forms of abuse are inflicted against children and most often, within the context of organised crime where fantasy, hard drugs & alcohol are regularly included in the mix.
Secondly and even more serious, is that the CC more or less invites abusers to commit crimes against children that will on disclosure, sound ‘incredible’.
Thirdly, according to EU & UN CPDS, every child reporting CSA makes a ‘good witness’ because; onus of proof of innocence is on the suspect.
I could here, share link after link citing the legally proven ‘incredible’ forms of abuse CSA victim-survivors have suffered, but there’s no need because as ‘Director of Public Prosecutions’ rolling out new CPD guidelines, you must surely have known exactly what CSA involves; why then, are your guidelines so beneficial to abusers?
UN & EU CPDs demand prompt police arrests, searches, and investigations in response to all CSA-related crime reports – the child is believed until thorough investigations prove otherwise.
EU CPDs recognise the power-imbalance between accused and accuser and take into account that for every child’s disclosure, there are countless other children who never find the courage or ability to disclose: Prompt arrest & investigation of all CSA suspects is the only way for progress toward combatting a psychosexual disease that is preying on children through every generation, and in that process, has gained footholds into very powerful social positions of authority e.g. ‘Sir’ Edward Heath aka “The Claw”:
Police chief ‘120 per cent convinced’ Edward Heath was a paedophile
Ex-Labour minister, Jewish Movement chair arrested on child grooming charges | Janta Ka Reporter:
Ex-Cameron aide Patrick Rock guilty of child image offences
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-36427629
Was Patrick Rock tipped off about arrest for child abuse images?
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/mar/04/cameron-patrick-rock-tip-off
Unfortunately for children residing in the UK, UN & EU CPDs are not enforced. British police are too busy determining whether or not a child’s crime report is ‘credible’ and organising ‘strategy meetings’ with various members of local authorities i.e. INVESTIGATING THE CHILD WITNESS.
All of that time does allow for suspects to be forewarned, particularly in case of organised CSA where such groups are known to have members in key LA and police positions – many of whom, infiltrate & corrupt e.g. Masonic Orders:
Police have strong links with Freemason Lodges: Besides corrupted police having opportunity to abuse their membership for purpose of recruiting and connecting with criminal others, honest police members are equally at risk via peer-pressure from within the lodge, to abuse their powers of office on side of alerting, shutting down and/or concealing any evidence of ‘high-profile’ organised crime.
In this respect, Freemasons have typically received a bad-press as ‘hubs’ for organised crime, when they are really no different to other UK institutions & authorities, and like those other authorities, the majority of members do much to serve UK society & communities regardless of the criminal elements within, and, will be vastly improved when criminal elements are ousted – this does apply equally to UK Parliament & Government.
‘Freemasons are blocking reform, says Police Federation leader Steve White.’
‘White said: “It’s about trust and confidence. There are people who feel that being a Freemason and a police officer is not necessarily a good idea. I find it odd that there are pockets of the organisation where a significant number of representatives are Freemasons.”
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/dec/31/freemasons-blocking-reform-police-federation-leader
The stark truth is; powerful people have opportunity, motive & intent to collude to abuse their powers in ways that simultaneously satisfy criminal desires and grant them protection from public scrutiny. This kind of collaborative activity does extend to persons outside of the group:
It is time UK CPDs accept and account for this undeniable reality.
Claims Jimmy Savile abused children at 21 children’s homes and schools in England must be investigated by local authorities, the government has said.
‘The organisations include a school for the blind in Harrogate, two schools and a children’s home in Savile’s birthplace of Leeds, and a Barnardo’s children’s home in Redbridge, north-east London.’
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-26766122
‘Sir’ J Savile was not a ‘lone-ranger’. He had strong connections with many powerful people of same ilk as himself: Did they all just vanish? How many are still in office by virtue of state-secrecy? How many more Savile equivalents are out there with or without the ‘high-profile’ status? Why do your ‘guidelines’ fail to take such predators into account because surely, before being outlined as ‘mandatory’ in UK CPDs, the CC was already, unofficially and widely applied to most if not all CSA reports i.e. The minority of Savile victim-witnesses who initially found courage and support enough to report him to police during childhood, were dismissed as *‘incredible’.
*It is here noted that Sir Starmer PM was head of public prosecutions during that period when initial allegations against Savile were reported and the CPS refused to prosecute.
Organised CSA in Rochdale, was equally protected by the Credibility Clause two years prior to it being ‘sanctified’ by the new CP Guidelines: Considering the evidence accumulated from the Rochdale investigations and the convictions of 7 men at the Old Bailey in London during 2013, why was the CC nonetheless included?
Noticeably, one of the Rochdale victims was a cared-for child:
‘In May 2012, nine men were found guilty of offences relating to a localised grooming network based in Rochdale. Newspaper articles reported that fifty-six men had been interviewed by police regarding an investigation in to the sexual abuse of forty-seven girls aged between 12 and 16.[1]
*‘One of the five victims had been placed in a residential care home in Rochdale by another Local Authority. Concerns were raised that the care system was failing those vulnerable children it was designed to support.
‘A further report referred to a police officer yawning during a recorded interview discussing a sexual attack on one of the victims.[2]
*‘Finally, it emerged that the CPS had originally decided not to prosecute, because of doubts about the victims’ credibility as witnesses
The prosecution only went ahead when this decision was reversed by the Chief Prosecutor for the North-West of England, Nazir Afzal, following his review of the case.’
https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmselect/cmhaff/68/6803.htm
Being a danger to children and a covert safety-net for suspects, the Credibility Clause needs to be immediately erased – as too, do the ‘strategy meetings’ with the child’s school and social services which, regularly occur prior to police investigations into the crime reports. Police investigations need to focus first on confirming lawful suspicion enough for police charges against the accused who, are lawfully required to prove their innocence.
One does not have to scroll too far online to find evidence to support the reality that certain police officers, social workers, educational & healthcare workers (of all genders), do commit crimes against children, and have access to children as well as, opportunity to connect with other abusers, and are at liberty to abuse their powers to dismiss children’s crime reports as ‘incredible’.
Rotherham scandal: watchdog reveals 98 investigations into police
‘Be Prepared To Think The Unthinkable’
A study by the University of Greenwich on the retrospective sexual misconduct and harassment of students by teachers in secondary schools in Ireland and the UK found:
- 85% experienced sexual harassment;
- 21% experienced unwanted sexual attention;
- 14% experienced at least one form of online sexual harassment;
- few students reported the incidents to the school, and for those that did, no action was taken.
https://safeguarding.network/content/safeguarding-resources/abuse-person-professional-role
Public & media attention onto police & LA failures exposed by the Rotherham & Rochdale scandals, was much diluted by the focus on Asian CSA gangs after police stated they were reticent in acting due to concerns about inciting racism i.e. Rotherham police seriously expect the UK public to believe they ignored organised CSA to avoid a racist ‘stir’, and not, because the police were corruptly acting also, to protect high profile offenders involved in a CSA gang that including drug-dealing and even, gun crime?
Given that the overwhelming majority of organised CSA offenders in UK, are White British or White European, why do Asian CSA-gangs appear to form the majority among arrest & convictions? Is this evidence of systemic racism that grants positive discrimination to White CSA gangs and their often, socially prominent members?
The ‘Rotherham-Case’ IOPC report as linked below, shows that SY Police were fully aware of the Rotherham CSA gang from as early as 2002 but after an intelligence analyst distributed the suspect criminal profiles to ‘senior officers’, nothing was done and said senior officers claiming they had never received the profiles: Is this at all credible?
IOPC independent investigation: The Operation Linden Report
‘A SYP drug strategic intelligence analyst produced three separate problem profiles (in 2002, 2003 and 2006). The first two analysed child abuse links to perpetrators involved in gun crime and drugs. The 2006 profile was more focused on CSA/E and links to named perpetrators, as well as to violent and gun crime. In 2006 the profiles were apparently circulated to senior officers for intelligence purposes and to help direct resources to help address serious criminality. However, we were unable to verify who received/read the profile despite the analyst telling us that senior officers were included in its distribution, and the profile featuring on a Policy Advisory Group meeting agenda. Its circulation, and proper consideration of its content, could have provided an opportunity for ownership, strategic oversight, and future plans for a pan-force response to tackling CSA/E.’
Britain’s far-right have picked up on the Rotherham scandal to the extent that many British people are led to falsely believe that Asian grooming & CSA gangs form the bulk of UK organised CSA, when the opposite is true. Asian & Black people form the minority; percentage-wise, such groups are proportionately represented among CSA convicts who are by proportionate majority, White UK nationals; for every offender listed there are probably 10-20+ more of all ethnicities, who are never identified and prosecuted:
UK CSA Database: https://offenders.org.uk/
The majority of child sexual abuse gangs are made up of white men under the age of 30, an official paper has said.
While most UK Police CAIT teams strive to do their very best with exceptionally limited resources, it appears the London Met in particular, is falling short in terms of the sheer scale of CSA crimes regularly happening in that city:
Met Police are still failing victims
‘While there have been action plans and initiatives for changing how the Met polices violence against women and girls, this latest report is a damning indictment of the ongoing failures to grapple with its issues – from institutional cultures of misogyny and racism to minimisation of offences of violence against women and children, failures to investigate properly, safeguard or assess risk.’
Why all the secrecy and hesitancy among police & LAs, in relation to CSA-related investigations & prosecutions, if not to avoid public exposure of at least, professional negligence or at worst, complicity?
How can the UK as a nation, begin to eradicate CSA-related corruption unless, we seriously tighten up existing UK CPDs?
Why have Britain’s Family Courts/FCs and UK Child Protection Agencies failed to champion EU & UN CPDs?
The title ‘Family Court’ is a misrepresentation of an institution that ought to be more appropriately titled: ‘Child Case Tribunal Centre’.
The idea that a child’s CSA crime report needs to automatically include the Family Courts, is yet another distraction from promptly investigating and/or arresting suspects. Regardless of whether a child is reporting abuse by family members or others as family friends and/or strangers, the child has reported a crime. Family Courts are not an appropriate place to address crime – certainly not organised crime:
FCs need to focus exclusively, on custody disputes but instead, they’re being used as a legal tool to silence CSA victims & witnesses and thereby, keep a lid on an issue that is secretly destroying UK society from within.
Britain needs an entirely new court to deal exclusively with CSA and trafficked & unaccompanied children. A court that will not operate in secrecy beyond respecting children’s right to privacy, and which, will not prosecute trafficked and/or groomed children who were forced to commit crimes but instead, will request thorough police investigations to find the trafficker and/or captor, who then, will be tried both for the crime of human trafficking and for crimes committed by their slaves/captives.
Victim Blaming in Family Court: How Child Custody Impacts Survivors
‘Rather than family court providing opportunities for survivors to rebuild their family and life, the system often acts as yet another systemic barrier that keeps survivors down and punishes them for their experience. This is a systemic family law failure that needs to be addressed.’
Helen Pitcher OBE, Chair of CCRC said:
“There is clear guidance on crimes committed by vulnerable trafficked children, but this sad case shows that miscarriages of justice still happen.
“It seems likely that Mr I would not have been convicted of these offences had proper enquiries been made and correct legal advice given.”
Arrested and ignored: The ordeal of grooming gang victims at hands of authorities there to protect them
‘A grooming gang victim was called a “slag” and accused of lying in court, while another reported being drugged and raped – only to see the perpetrator let off with a caution by police, a report has revealed.
“A police officer told me I was what was going wrong in our society”
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/grooming-gang-victims-authorities-iicsa-b2005083.html
Secrecy is the tool of every criminal and CSA is shrouded with secrecy in Britain: The ‘biggest shift for a generation’ is when the state-imposed secrecy around CSA & CSE ends.
In light of the evidence, it is high time that Child Protection professionals are lawfully required to assess the balance of risks between a vulnerable child remaining in the family home with Family Support, against the known risks and outcomes for children in state care:
A child’s CSA report, ought not to be an invitation for LAs to remove the child from their family home, and/or to promptly submit the case before FCs unless, the child is deemed at immediate risk and has no other remedy for protection within extended family or community friends.
The understanding that a CSA victim-witness is traumatised, afraid and needs the care & comfort of loving family members and/or community friends, must be prioritised over other lesser concerns – at such time, a child is most in need of their Human Right to Family Life: The child can be the only person with rights of privacy in CSA cases. Suspects can be named simply as e.g. ‘Defendant 1’ in cases where cross reference could reveal victim-identity; the case itself can have no rights of privacy because the public need to be aware of exactly what kind of criminals are operating in Britain and on what scale, in order to raise vigilance and awareness.
It is directly through lack of publicity on organised and individual CSA cases, that public concern is severely negated.
Without doubt, CSA criminals are and have been, at the core of corrupted UK authorities and that does include Parliament & Government: There is a huge power-imbalance between victims & accused and yet, UK CP ‘guidelines’ thus far, have proven to be; ‘the biggest shift for a generation of CSA predators’ – it’s almost as if certain guidelines were introduced specifically, to delay police action on promptly investigating CSA suspects cited in children’s crime reports?
Why does Britain not have a police taskforce to focus exclusively on identifying & rescuing domestic children shown in CSA images?
To date, Britain has a dismal record when it comes to sentencing against people convicted of uploading or downloading sexually explicit images and videos of children. A quick ‘google’ search will cite case after case where offenders received suspended sentences, community service and/or fines, and some, still permitted to have contact with children.
We need to get to grips with the reality that buyers & sharers of CSA images & videos, are literally, the ‘manure’ for exponential growth in a £multibillion global industry. Looking at, selling, sharing, making or buying CSA related products, is not only to participate in and condone crimes against children, it is to also, incite CSA as an active consumer and thereby, providing a ‘market’: Far too many CSA suspects & convicts are left unscrutinised by police in relation to investigating their wider networks of contacts. Furthermore, efforts to identify & rescue children shown in illicit images and videos, appear to be virtually non-existent.
As a CSA survivor myself, and as one who was failed during childhood by police & social services in terms of no prosecution against a criminally abusive father, and social workers persuading me to ‘rebuild a relationship’ with him only to then, suffer more abuse – it is a dismal reality to observe that nothing much has changed in the last 50 years except, the shoddy police & LA responses myself and countless other victim-survivors of my generation received during childhood, now appear to be enshrined into UK family court ‘law’.
Why was there nobody to represent myself as a child victim of crime?
EU CPDs recommend therapists & ILGs for every child victim-witness – Why has Britain failed to provide these?
Independent Legal Guardians/ILGs, as recommended by EU CPDs, are clearly, the most positive way forward i.e. Every child reporting or accused of crime, is granted an ILG who, will be answerable to an equally independent overseeing authority. The ILG will act to ensure the child receives justice and respect for their human rights, and will also, represent the child as intermediary when regular and/or family courts & social services etc, are involved.
A child needs to be free to retract a crime report but all too often, a child’s retraction is taken at face value by police who then, close the case; impacts of grooming, coercion and *Stockholm Syndrome are not accounted for. In contrast, EU CPDs state that a retraction cannot mean police will automatically cease investigations.
* The relevance of Stockholm syndrome
‘Stockholm syndrome is a useful concept as it can provide an over-arching understanding of why victim-survivors of child sexual abuse have acted and responded as they do. This phenomenon is also referred to as traumatic bonding, hostage identification syndrome, or survival identification syndrome.’
file:///C:/Users/admin/Downloads/nballantyne,+06_Julich_&_Oak.pdf
There needs to be a police record of when, where and to whom, a child first expressed their wish to retract in order to rule out coercion or fear of reprisals. And, in cases of lawfully plausible retraction or, where a child’s crime report is disproved, it is the triage of parent/guardian, ILG & therapist who need to find out what has prompted a child to lie.
An ILG will ensure every child-victim-witness is promptly granted an independent child-therapist, and an independent medical expert, both of whom, may also act as witnesses in relation to a child’s disclosures.’
Essentially, what Britain’s children need, are the EU CPDs which, operate like a legal-machine to both protect children and prevent crimes against them:
EU CPDs:
‘Directive 2011/93/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child pornography.’
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32011L0093
The EU CPDs are established on indepth study of historical and ongoing CSA crimes – they fully recognise and account for, the types of criminals who commit crimes against children – at every step they act to thwart the previous police & LA ‘norms’ that all too regularly permitted even the very worst CSA crime reports to be casually dismissed.
EU CPDs are so good, it’s a wonder as to why Britain spent so much time & expense on the IICSA Inquiry as a means to better understand the issue, when it was already thoroughly investigated by the EU? Britain could easily have opted instead, to adopt EU CPDs and issue an invitation for the public to report ongoing and historical crimes to local police who would have much benefitted from the extra funding that was instead, handed to the IICSA – money that could equally have been shared toward recruiting, training and funding an army of independent ILGs:
The inquiry cost £186.6 million up until the report’s publication date.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/alexis-jay-the-king-archbishop-iicsa-tony-blair-b2206855.html
Considering the NSPCC has estimated that the ‘human and emotional costs experienced by victims and survivors in the UK, amounts to around £38 billion annually (2012/13 prices)’, and more recently, a UK Gov’t Executive Summary of a report into the social & economic costs of CSA, estimates at least £10.1 billion (in 2018/19 prices), per year, the £186 million spent by IICSA was to throw mere pennies at a most terrible issue that is consistently undermining the very fabric of British society.
Impacts of CSA:
UK Gov’t Executive Summary:
In direct ignorance of the true value of the EU CPDs, a few crumbs went toward providing a substandard report that we really did not need because the Inquiry only managed to cover a tiny fraction of CSA reports, and even then, an overwhelming majority of those submitting evidence received unsatisfactory responses with many left in worsened emotional, psychological & physical health related directly, to the trauma of contributing to an Inquiry which proved inadequate if any help at all to survivors.
Inquiry into child sexual abuse ‘not fit for purpose’, claims victims group:
‘Survivors of Organised and Institutional Abuse becomes second group to withdraw, claiming victims have been ‘totally marginalised’ from process –
’ – adding that the inquiry had descended into a “very costly academic report writing and literature review exercise”.
Regardless of IICSA failings, the lessons learned and resulting advice on necessary measures to address the issues raised, have been to date, thoroughly ignored:
The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse made 20 recommendations based on horrific testimony. Yet not one proposal has been implemented, reports Catherine Baksi
https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/features/failed-state/5121272.article
The ultimate conclusion and suspicion, is that Britain has largely marginalised the issue of CSA on behalf of; maintaining secrecy, protecting abusers, limiting publicity, criminalising survivors, silencing witnesses & protestors, and, ensuring every generation produces the next supply of abusers & victims. Otherwise, Britain would have picked up on the EU CPDs like they were hot-cakes!
Too ‘hot’ perhaps for Britain’s long established CSA networks i.e. P.I.E.?
The Paedophile Information Exchange/PIE was established specifically, to sack Britain’s laws against CSA, and it is a testament to the group power & influence of the PIE network, that they managed to lobby Parliament and enrol some Labour politicians to help further their cause:
‘Over a decade, PIE spokesmen gave interviews to the media arguing that adults and children had a human right to have sex with each other. Four years old, they argued, was an age at which most children could give consent.’
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cq62dp092nzo
‘Labour’s Deputy Leader, her husband, Jack Dromey MP, shadow spokesman for Home Affairs, and the former Labour Health Secretary, Patricia Hewitt, were key figures in the National Council for Civil Liberties (NCCL), which helped PIE gain credibility as a legitimate campaign group.
Meanwhile, a Home Office investigation is taking place into allegations that PIE received tens of thousands of pounds from taxpayers between 1976-1979 when James Callaghan was the Labour Prime Minister.’
It is today, commonly understood that CSA and other forms of child abuse often associated with CSA, majorly impact child development and predisposes victim-survivors to a generally unhappy adult life-experience; poverty, drug & alcohol abuse, revictimization, gambling, eating-disorders, depression, ill health both mentally & physically, homelessness, broken relationships – the list goes on…
Psychology Today: The Long-Lasting Consequences of Child Sexual Abuse
Children are first and foremost, developing human beings and as such, are not a ‘minor’ concern in terms of adequately evaluating and satisfying their emotional, psychological, physical & vocational needs. Far too often, little attention is paid to children’s vocational needs i.e. Lack of an education system that helps a child discover and practise their innate skills & interests; why are UK schools failing to teach children about parenthood, building relationships, maintaining a family home etc?
Too much time is spent on what the world wants make of a child: What humanity needs is to take a step back and think about what the child makes of adults and their alleged “adult” world.
‘Family Law’ as linked below, is a published report that was previously submitted to the House of Lords after a call for evidence. It focuses primarily on cared-for children and their experiences when coming into contact with UK authorities. Evidence is provided by a variety of officially recognised studies & reports that continue to gather dust on academic shelves.
In recent years, funding for updated studies has significantly decreased and many issues have never been reinvestigated – nonetheless, all such fairly recent historical studies accurately reflect an ongoing social problem that has not lessened over time.
On the other hand, funding for privatised care-provision appears limitless i.e. The average annual charge for a child in a private equity-run care home is £281,000. That’s five times the cost of being a boarder at Eton.
How can such sums be justified in context of further traumatising children by the process of removal from their family, school & community, on grounds of e.g. A ‘future emotional risk’ or ‘emotional neglect’ when surely, it would be healthier for both parents & child to benefit from just a fraction of those care costs and receive extensive Family Support as is their Human Right?
All child care provision & Social Services need to be renationalised because the way things stand right now, there’s too much of a profit incentive in favour of breaking families apart – or else, why not instead, just pay for the child to board at e.g. Eton and return home for supervised holidays?
The indisputable fact is, there’s now a ‘Bounty’ on every UK child’s head:
How can a child in care cost £281,000 a year? Ask the wealth funds that have councils over a barrel
I hope you will read through the Family Law report and take note of the insights and recommendations proposed therein – especially the proposals for drastic changes in the UK education system, as well as in current UK protocols and impacts on taking children into care:
https://debdahvibez.blogspot.com/2022/05/uk-national-emergency-children-at-risk.html
Drugs, poverty and a history of unlawful discrimination are key ingredients for sustaining a culture that covertly permits an ethos of impunity for organised & individual CSA criminals:
In order to gain any advances toward addressing CSA, we need to recognise paedophilia as a psycho-sexual-disease: EU CPDs equate to a vaccination.
Unfortunately, the full potency of the EU-CPD-Vaxx is limited without also tackling other forms of abuse that facilitate the CSA psychology i.e. Extreme wealth and social privilege are effectively, political benefits gained through centuries of abuse and negative judgements against women, children and the poor; social-privilege does predispose its beneficiaries toward psychopathy, sadism, and narcissism:
Psychology’s “Dark Triad” and the Billionaire Class
The super-rich aren’t the role models we need to advance the common good:
‘The first trait of the Dark Triad — Machiavellianism — refers to one’s willingness to deceitfully manipulate and exploit people and circumstances for personal gain. In an illuminating series of studies, psychologists have found that this tendency is more common among those with greater wealth and status.
The worst levels of sadistic CSA are commonly perpetrated by the ultra-rich, who use their wealth & status to avoid both LA & Police scrutiny:
Rich families use ‘privilege to opt out’ of child services
‘Social workers had uncovered cases of sexual exploitation and emotional abuse, but found children’s services were biased towards poorer families.
Professor Claudia Bernard, who led the study, said neglect cases in affluent areas often went “under the radar”...
‘One social worker said: “They’ll get on to their local councillor, someone who they go hunting or shooting with or play golf with. – “They know people in high places and they threaten you with people as well“.’
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-44084298
We cannot forget nor fail to take into account, that UK society is founded on a 1000 year-long oppression against women & children’s universal human rights which, previously were commonly integrated within pre-Roman Christian British culture i.e. Celtic Christianity viewed children as pure & holy, while in contrast, Roman Christianity judged them ‘sinners’ born from equally sinful mothers condemned as ‘daughters of Eve’, to bear a form of collective guilt & punishment for her ‘original sin’.
Jesus it appears, arrived only to forgive males.
Discrimination against women continued well into the 1970s until finally, the law was changed and gender-discrimination outlawed. Nonetheless, the price paid via impact of centuries of discrimination and the inherent pseudo-religious misogyny supporting that, which, has consistently robbed women of status, autonomy, property, wealth, home, family & children, and most importantly, a voice, has never been officially acknowledged as slavery and as criminal, collective punishment against real living humans, for an alleged crime committed by a single mythical character in a story that has its origins in ancient Sumer.
When we add the depraved horror of the ‘witch trials’; state & church persecution against women & children amount to an historical holocaust against sanity, balance, care, compassion, justice, ethics and sound reason.
Wrongs were done – the price is still being paid. 50+ years of ‘feminism’ have been a complete scam that told females they were ‘liberated’ by being free to live like males and e.g. Submit to employment standards that do not take into account breaks needed for menstruation or menopause.
Those women of history who did rise to power were surrounded by powerful males to influence and direct her decisions and choices. The same continues today as more women rise into powerful social positions; the point here, is that an extensive history steeped in misogyny has laid the foundations for every British institution, which, had already infected the general public with negative and false judgements against feminine intelligence, reasoning and ability, alongside maligned judgements against children, as part of systemic prejudice.
The relatively recent changes supporting women’s and children’s rights, have failed to address the historical and ongoing psychological damage that programmed males to generally perceive women as foolish, intellectually inferior and worthy of only minimal credibility i.e. A female or child’s allegations against males were commonly discredited as false. Children were prolifically available for abuse; at home, at work, at school, at church, in the orphanages…
British society has been shaped by an antiquated ruling consciousness that fundamentally relied on strict social division between rich & poor, men & women, servant & slave, adult & child, White & Black. The beliefs & opinions of those rulers majorly impact social consciousness via baseless propaganda that invites & condones what becomes almost a ‘sport’ for unleashing ‘popularised’ negativity as a ‘vent’ onto the socially denigrated who are thus, scapegoated to absorb the general hate and misery that over 80% of British society suffered in poverty. It is a psychological legacy every bit as real as monetary inheritance:
‘The intergenerational cycle of abuse begins when we witness or experience abusive behavior in our early life. This may be physical or emotional abuse – It includes sexual abuse, neglect, abandonment, or being rejected by our parents and family members, too. Even receiving constant criticism and shaming, instead of positive messages, can have big negative impacts and set us off on a troubled path.’
https://www.ananiasfoundation.org/intergenerational-cycle-of-abuse/
Poverty is a form of social abuse whereby, it is commonly accepted that the bulk of UK population are ‘lawfully’ economically restricted and, looked down on as ‘inferior’ – even in those social spheres, some more harshly judged than others i.e. Homophobia, and Racism – another ‘gift’ of State & Church/Colonialism that judged Black & Brown people inferior to Whites – again, history leaves us in no doubt that people of colour have suffered and continue to endure the impacts of racist psychology, which like misogyny, is equally, a psycho-social disease.
The propaganda against minorities, and the poor & vulnerable continues to this day:
To what extent is claiming benefits stigmatised in Britain?
‘…benefits stigma has a long history in Britain. Indeed, the lineage of stigma can be traced through 14th-century laws attempting to punish undeserving vagrants, through the (literal) branding of the undeserving poor in the 16th century, to the humiliation of the workhouses in the 19th century (Golding and Middleton 1982; Page 1984; Spicker 1984; Stone 1984). Stigma was often a deliberate tactic to discourage all but the most desperate from applying for support.’
Prison is not a solution for convicted criminals infected with a psycho-social and/or psycho-sexual ‘disease’. What those people need are secure psychiatric & therapy units in order to understand, educate and treat them, and to decide at what point they may be considered safe for release.
In recognition of the issue, the UK would do well to establish Walk-In centres for people who are struggling within, against criminal social and/or sexual urges; we need as a society, to accept that such urges in themselves are not a crime until the moment they’re enacted. Therapists & psychologists etc., need to determine the root-causes behind such urges in order to make progress toward rehabilitation: More studies are needed on perpetrators of individual & organised CSA-CSE i.e. Why do so many among the fraction of abusers identified & prosecuted, hold professional positions?
Characteristics and motivations of perpetrators of child sexual exploitation
‘Perpetrators were generally identified as male, white and aged between 18 and 85 years (with the average age in individual studies ranging from 30 to 46 years); a high proportion were employed, with a large number of these in professional jobs.’
The bulk of abused & trafficked children come from impoverished homes & families – poverty renders men, women & children easy-prey for predators. Therefore, eradication of poverty is imperative toward combatting CSA.
Unfortunately, the present two-child Benefit cap, coupled with government-imposed austerity, means ever more British children are growing up at risk:
10,000 children dragged into poverty by two-child limit since Labour took office
‘The two-child limit denies child allowances in universal credit (UC) and tax credits worth up to £3,455 per year to third or subsequent children born after April 2017. Abolishing the two-child limit is the most cost-effective way to reduce child poverty which is at a record level ( 4.3 million children in poverty).’
https://cpag.org.uk/news/10000-children-dragged-poverty-two-child-limit-labour-took-office
Children from impoverished/deprived communities form the majority of those passing through family courts and into state-care. History has proven via the likes of “Sir” Jimmy Savile & Co, and countless historical CSA cases, that cared-for children be it in care-homes, secure units or hospitals – or even schools & nurseries, are the easiest and most regular targets particularly, for organised abuse, along with impoverished children trafficked into Britain from abroad.
Way too many children are denied their human right to a loving family home due directly to poverty related social problems which, regularly include drugs & alcohol abuse; funding for satisfying an addiction is an incentive for crime.
Britain as a society, needs to accept responsibility for creating and nurturing abusive-parents into being via socially divisive propaganda, traditional & mythical beliefs & judgements, poor education, as well as, subversive economic and criminal policies i.e. Austerity & drug-prohibition. We need to recognise the inherent fact that drug-use in Britain is pervasive – people from all walks of life are using them and that includes members of UK Parliament:
A UK Chancellor of The Exchequer:
UK Parliament:
‘Drug detection wipes found traces of cocaine in 11 out of 12 bathrooms tested on the premises, according the report, including a lavatory close to British Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s office. The bathrooms tested included some only accessible to those who hold parliamentary passes, including lawmakers, staffers, and journalists.’
One of Britain’s top economists [senior advisor to former Chancellor of Exchequer George Osborne] was allegedly filmed smoking crack and accused of assaulting a prostitute
Ending prohibition = Decriminalising drug use & sale alongside increased public education on drug-use, issuing licenses and ensuring substance quality, will have a majorly beneficial impact toward decreasing CSA and all crime in Britain as well as, dramatically decrease pressure on NHS resources.
Drug use among high profile & professional people as police, teachers, MPs, gov’t ministers etc., is a common form of leverage for blackmail and that is an extremely serious issue in relation to Britain’s national security, because when Parliament is full of illegal drug users, WHO is really running Britain; Gov’t & MPs or their dealers & blackmailers? Is drug-use involved in devising government policy?
Taxes on recreational drugs could easily fund many UK services e.g. NHS, education, rehab facilities, an army of ILGs, and also, Therapists & Family Support workers to help UK parents to become better & happier mums & dads: The majority of neglected children growing up in poverty, do not want to enter state-care, they just want their parents to receive help in order to break the patterns & cycles of abuse and neglect.
We cannot continue to ignore the reality of intergenerational poverty as a prolific, underlying aspect of British ‘culture’ – a subculture covertly sustained by social ignorance and general condemnation; people judged ‘worthless’ from childhood are robbed of their human right to the positive self-esteem that is a core foundation of child development: Within an ethos of social acceptance & assistance, every child is entitled to benefit from unconditional positive regard – children who receive the opposite of that are inevitably, emotionally and psychologically handicapped for the rest of their lives.
The idea that bad people are poor & ‘incredible’ and good people are wealthy & ‘credible’, is a prevailing myth that needs to be permanently erased. The reality that poverty makes people vulnerable to crime & criminals – especially in relation to drugs and CSA, can no longer be ignored. We need to stop being smart and get clever:
The vast sums of public money presently poured into police, lawyers. courts & prisons via drug-crime, has not helped lessen either the quantity of drugs consumed nor the amount of addicts; what we’ve witnessed is a massive increase in both drugs & users which in turn, have increased all other crime including theft, murder, abduction, blackmail, organised crime, gun & knife crime, and human trafficking = END DRUG PROHIBITION – let police, lawyers, courts & detention centres apply their full time & resources into addressing other crimes and in particular, CSA.
ICAT: Call for Accelerated Action by 2025 to PREVENT AND END CHILD TRAFFICKING
4. Strengthen measures to deter traffickers:
‘States should review and strengthen legislation, regulations, policies, and practices against child trafficking to take into account emerging forms and methods of exploitation of children and ensure more effective deterrence and criminal justice responses. This should include the assessment and strengthening of criminal justice systems’ action and capacities to disrupt and dismantle business models utilized by child traffickers, inter alia through financial investigation, to hold perpetrators accountable and end their impunity, including those associated with terrorism and its financing or taking place in conflict or post-conflict settings.’
Over 1,100 children trafficked into UK drug trade, data shows
Drug charity calls for legal regulation of drug market to protect vulnerable children.
Decriminalising drugs and legislating against inappropriate use such as during working hours etc., would see an end to the huge sums of public expenditure & consumption – all of that income once filling the pockets of organised criminals, corrupt officials, and being poured into the Crown-controlled Tax Havens, will instead, provide income for legitimate business and government spending – enough to fill an e.g. “£20bn black hole” in the UK economy.
The Offshore World Part 1:
The offshore world also harbours criminals who launder the proceeds of corruption, drug cartels and human trafficking there. Even global terrorism is funded with the help of offshore centres. Shamefully, many European Union (EU) member states actively protect this system.
Drugs Prohibition naturally, creates crime & criminals who need a continual flow of new addicts – each successive generation of youth are left to face a predatory force of subversive powers which in turn, rely on corrupted state authorities. Prohibition against addictive substances inevitably guarantees widespread corruption on every level of society, and exactly facilitates the circumstances and networks required for human trafficking and organised CSA. Trafficked & CSA victims are often controlled by drugs as part of their enslavement:
The links between substance misuse and modern slavery
‘Traffickers who are using alcohol and drugs to control and coerce victims, paying victims in alcohol or drugs may also be involved in illegal drug markets. There is little evidence of connectivity between strategies for substance misuse services, victims of modern slavery and strategies to tackle the illegal drugs market.’
https://www.salvationarmy.org.uk/sites/default/files/resources/2019-09/
Britain’s largely unregulated Freeports/Lawless-Corporate-Tax-Free-Zones, are also, a huge ‘gift’ for drug-smuggling & human traffickers and for all other nefarious activities, as Richard J Murphy (director of Tax Research LLP), explains via the video links below; most British people remain uninformed about the exact nature of Freeports in Britain and certainly have no idea that they amount to a form of 21st century Enclosure of our land – how long before their presently ‘imaginary borders’ become solid walls? They need to be abolished or else, strictly regulated:
Why Freeports are a terrible idea
Freeports are dangerous
The Danger of Freeports
The undeniable fact is; while ever British society is afflicted with a drug-related criminal network that runs from top to bottom within present social spheres, we as a nation are never going to make genuine progress toward combatting child trafficking, and individual & organised CSA not even with the EU CPDs.
Hemp as a Foundation for Brighter Consciousness:
Successfully combatting CSA requires a commitment to raising public consciousness into a higher standard of being, not by force or propaganda but through policy and direct action on key issues i.e. Decriminalisation will naturally mean that Hemp & cannabis could be freely grown in every home & community, as well as farmed.
Millions of British people could contribute toward providing collective resources for nationalised and private hemp & cannabis eco-industry; from healthcare products to food, fuel, animal feed, paper, oil, biodegradable plastic, textiles and even building materials – Britain has a chance to gain a head-start in eco-industry – bearing in mind that industrial hemp farming requires minimal pesticides and fertiliser, and can be grown on the poorest soil which subsequently, is somewhat enriched every few months by the roots of the previous crop.
Hemp cultivation contributes to the European Green Deal objectives
Skip chart(EU land area used for hemp fibre cultivation – Source: Eurostat)
Minus decriminalisation, hemp farming is priced out of the general market due to high taxes, steep license costs, and satisfying the stringent rules around hemp farming which, are set only because industrial hemp is virtually identical to the currently criminalised THC-rich/Sativa varieties.
Considering the tremendous benefits of all varieties of hemp to people of all ages, it is indeed, criminal for any government of any nation to ban it. Children especially, may benefit far better from THC-related products than the addictive pharmaceuticals presently being used to treat e.g. ADHD.
There have been many studies on the impacts of cannabis on child development – a sample of which, are shared below:
Prenatal marijuana exposure and neonatal outcomes in Jamaica: an ethnographic study
‘At 1 month, the exposed neonates showed better physiological stability and required less examiner facilitation to reach organized states. The neonates of heavy-marijuana-using [breastfeeding] mothers had better scores on autonomic stability, quality of alertness, irritability, and self-regulation and were judged to be more rewarding for caregivers.’
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8121737/
Totality of the Evidence Suggests Prenatal Cannabis Exposure Does Not Lead to Cognitive Impairments: A Systematic and Critical Review
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32457680/
The state-enforced removal of hemp as a staple-food & resource from the human diet & life, has without doubt, inflicted immense harm to human psychology and not least due to the harsh circumstances commonly endured in an imbalanced, discriminatory, judgemental world, which does render people susceptible to alcoholism and addictive drugs – where there’s a choice, most will opt for the non-addictive substance i.e. Cannabis.
All varieties of hemp have been used by humanity for thousands of years, and hempseed being a staple food providing protein and essential oils to the human brain which, are vital for healthy child brain development; the human brain actually has receptors specifically for receiving THC:
Harvard Health: The endocannabinoid system: Essential and mysterious
‘The ECS comprises a vast network of chemical signals and cellular receptors that are densely packed throughout our brains and bodies. The “cannabinoid” receptors in the brain — the CB1 receptors — outnumber many of the other receptor types on the brain. They act like traffic cops to control the levels and activity of most of the other neurotransmitters. This is how they regulate things: by immediate feedback, turning up or down the activity of whichever system needs to be adjusted, whether that is hunger, temperature, or alertness.
https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/the-endocannabinoid-system-essential-and-mysterious-202108112569
WHY does this harmless plant continue to be prohibited if not purely, on strength of ignorant propaganda or else, to maintain a system of poverty & crime/depravation & criminalisation?
Disturbingly, Britain & USA have greatly contributed toward global prohibition on ‘recreational’ drugs and this does include anti-hemp-farming clauses in e.g. IMF loans i.e. Is the nation a signatory to the Geneva Convention and therefore, in agreement with prohibition against cannabis? – Loans that resource-rich nations like Africa would never need were it not being corporately looted via the regular strings controlling its politicians.
Until recently, hemp farming was prohibited in most of Africa. However, with its recent decriminalisation of cannabis, South Africa’s hemp industry looks set to boom:
Africa’s Industrial Hemp Industry Projected To Be Worth Up To $2.4 Billion:
Regenerative Hemp Farming in South Africa
‘Both private use and private cultivation of cannabis was decriminalised by a Constitutional Court judgment in September 2018. In May 2020, the government redefined industrial hemp with a 0.2% tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) guideline and are now taking the next steps to make regenerative hemp farming in South Africa a possibility.’
A history of cannabis (ganga) as an economic crop in Bangladesh from the late 18th century to 1989:
https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jsta/66/1/66_21/_pdf
The problem is that for decades now, countless families in places like Africa & India were deprived of a staple crop, and all on the foundation of a US-created falsehood against ‘marijuana’. Child suffering and poverty massively increased through loss of subsistence farming because with prohibition also comes a police-force to enforce the ban.
Hemp & cannabis prohibition is perhaps the most vile and ignorant legislation ever to be penned on our planet. Many like myself, as informed and compassionate people, feel exactly the same way toward Britain’s current and in reality, virtually non-existent CPDs.
And, it may seem the inclusion of ‘hemp’ here, has veered off-topic and only because as your 2013 CSA guidelines show; UK gov’t & Parliament clearly, have a very limited understanding about cause & effect and, all of the reasons why hemp was prohibited in the first place i.e. To deny the public a right to self-sustainability, and to assure corporate profits in oil-based plastics, wood-pulp & cotton mills, and also, to distract a usefully corruptible police-force: Corrupt police cover up crimes – especially CSA.
If police were paid realistic wages and received more therapeutic support & advanced training, maybe they would be less open to topping up their income via corruption?
Perhaps UK Gov’t & Parliament, could find the time to learn about the history behind cannabis prohibition in the USA and then, recognise it as a blight against our human rights to thrive in a balanced, caring, productive, eco-friendly, and peaceful society that values every child?
‘The Emperor Wears No Clothes’ by Jack Herer
‘“Should we believe self-serving, ever-growing drug enforcement/drug treatment bureaucrats, whose pay and advancement depends on finding more and more people to arrest and ‘treat’?
More Americans die in just one day in prisons, penitentiaries, jails and stockades than have ever died from marijuana throughout history. Who are they protecting? From what?”—Fred Oerther, MD, Portland, Oregon
Conclusion
Britain’s corporate Family Courts and privatised Social Services, who appear to ‘own’ CSA witness-victims and the crimes they have survived;are either unwittingly or knowingly, facilitating a form of for-profit legalised child trafficking that palms off children to one carer after another, within a process of removal from the family home which, has profoundly distressing long-term emotional impacts on the child – and those poor children thereafter, left facing an incredibly bleak future:
“We are failing those who spent their childhood in care”, says landmark Report:
‘People who spent time in care during childhood are being ‘failed’ and some social and health inequalities have worsened for these adults since the 1970s, finds a new UCL-led report, based on research documenting people’s lives until their 40s.’
The lifelong health and well-being of care leavers
‘Every policy should take into account the needs of care leavers. There are large health, education and employment inequalities in adulthood for people with care experience. When the state intervenes to protect a child, this should be a lifelong commitment. All public services should be aware of the additional needs that are faced by care leavers and work together to meet them.’
Despite numerous reports citing the difficulties and poor prospects for care-leavers, little has been done to adequately address this, the UK child-care system regularly fails to provide ongoing support to care-leavers, who are often left to face life alone with no direct or extended family they can rely on in times of need.
Worse still, an extraordinarily high percentage of cared-for children end up in secure-care-units/’child-detention’ and/or incarcerated as adults. It appears Britain’s children-in-need are receiving despicably substandard care in return for the vast sums of public money spent on corporate-care provision:
Looked-after Children The Silent Crisis
‘With the combination of instability, deprivation, and the lack of support structures, it is not surprising that children who are in, or who have experienced care, are overrepresented within the youth justice system. While children in care only account for around 1% of all children, they are hugely overrepresented in the youth justice system, with HM Inspectorate of Prisons estimating that in 2015-2016 approximately 39% of the children in secure training centres and 37% of the children in young offenders’ institutions had been in care.20’
According to the research presented in every officially recognised study on the issue of individual and organised CSA, Britain’s children remain at an extraordinarily high risk whether in care or the family home; according to the report by a UK Children’s Commissioner; only 1 in 8 CSA victim-survivors will ever disclose to authorities:
I repeat: INTERNAL CORRUPTION NEEDS TO BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT.
Again, I have personal experience of how police acted to shut down a CSA case against a family member who worked extensively in child psychology. He sexually harassed and violently assaulted myself, and sexually abused two already abused and very vulnerable, direct family members. No one at all needed to investigate the vulnerable children he had direct access to, not even after NSPCC had contacted police? A couple of years after the crime report got quashed, he received an award for his “outstanding contribution to child psychology”. All I know is that one of his victims phoned me in tears after police had visited for a statement: “They really scared me – I couldn’t go through with it.” Police had also tried to persuade them to sign a statement claiming that I(who reported the disclosures to NSPCC), am; ‘mad and a liar’.
Can you imagine how that feels Sir Starmer PM? To be repeatedly brushed aside, ignored as ‘trivial’, slandered, despised, socially judged for my disabilities, forced to live a life in poverty & depression. Worse of all, to witness police and social workers standing on side of the abusers, and then, one of them gets an AWARD from for his services to children, after he abused already abused children in full academic knowledge of the immense emotional & psychological damage he was inflicting?
But Britain does not need to ‘imagine’ that scenario, UK public, the survivors & Parliament already witnessed & experienced it i.e. When Savile received his Knighthood.
THAT is the ‘Britain’ I know Sir Starmer PM.
And I am sick of it.
Sick of banging on doors for help; viable solutions for a myriad of social & economic issues ignored – negatively judged for shining my light into a dark place – though it seems a brighter world is not wanted because genuinely positive improvements to UK society such as e.g. Adopting EU CPDs and ending Prohibition & austerity, equate to a threat against profits & power to existing criminal networks i.e. A UK PM – commonly known to use cocaine – running to Ukraine (a nation where Western-backed Nazis staged a coup in 2014), to break International Law and stop a peace treaty: “Lets just fight” Boris Johnson PM said:
‘Official: Johnson Forced Kyiv To Refuse Russian Peace Deal
‘Russia was “ready to end the war if we took neutrality,” Ukraine’s former top negotiator confirmed, but Boris Johnson said, “let’s just fight.”
The European Conservative,com
Coup in Ukraine: A warning to the international working class
‘What had been unthinkable in Europe since the fall of Hitler’s Third Reich in 1945 has come to pass: while the US and Germany ruthlessly and recklessly destabilized the country, fascists became the decisive force on the ground.
Did Johnson PM join Ukraine’s frontlines to “fight” – or what of the UK gov’t ministers & Parliament MPs who supported him, did they go fight Russia too? No they did not, they expect the commoners to unquestioningly fight & die on their order.
…And now to witness the horror that ensued in Ukraine thereafter, teenagers being dragged from their homes to die in WW1 style trenches…
As if the rage & despair over Ukraine was not terrible enough – next, it’s UK Parliament supporting Israel’s alleged ‘right’ to ignore human rights and international law! Sir Starmer PM actually stating publicly, that Israel “does have that right to defend herself” in direct response to a question on issue of Israel denying food, water, fuel & medicines to civilians in Gaza.
With ICC arrest warrants on Israeli gov’t leaders and present ICJ decisions, no one can deny we’re witnessing blatant genocide and a Zionist land grab in Palestine, Syria and Lebanon, whilst also, pushing now for war with Iran!
Amnesty International investigation concludes Israel is committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza
A species that loves its children does everything possible to prevent war because we care for the vulnerable – we think of them FIRST and where necessary, we act to protect them immediately in face of threat, Children trapped in war zones are exceptionally vulnerable to abuse:
Children under attack
‘Children are coming under attack in conflicts across the world. We cannot accept this deadly new normal.’
https://www.unicef.org/children-under-attack
What did UK Government do on Oct 7th 2023, when it was very clear what Israel intended to perpetrate against the citizens of Gaza where almost 50% of the population are children: Did you Sir Starmer PM, promptly issue a statement confirming UK compliance with International Law & Human Rights, and thereafter, begin negotiations around protecting & providing for, Palestinian children & civilians?
No. Instead, you promptly stated that you stand by Israel’s right to defend itself. You voted against a ceasefire. You assisted in the attack with – spy planes, military intelligence, weapons and funding:
Keir Starmer’s Gaza spy plane caught on camera
Exclusive: A Royal Air Force plane conducting surveillance of Palestine has been filmed taking off from its base on Cyprus for the first time.
UK exported parts for Israeli air force after suspending arms sales
UK Cargo documents show how British-made aircraft components were shipped to Israel last month.
GENEVA, 18 October 2024 – “Gaza is the real-world embodiment of hell on earth for its one million children. And it’s getting worse, day-by-day, as we see the horrific impact of the daily airstrikes and military operations on Palestinian children:
“Let me try and share what that looks like, via one child: A seven-year-old little girl, Qamar. During an attack on Jabalia camp, Qamar was struck in the foot. The only hospital she could be taken to – a maternity hospital – was then under siege for 20 days, by which time the shrapnel in Qamar’s foot had led to infection. Because she couldn’t be moved, and because the hospital didn’t have the resources to cope with all the trauma cases, doctors had to amputate Qamar’s leg.
“In any vaguely normal situation, this little girl’s leg would never have needed to be amputated. She and her mother and sister – who was also injured – were then forced to evacuate. On foot. A seven-year-old child with a newly amputated leg, was pushed from north to south. They now live in a ripped tent, surrounded by stagnant water and other families enduring similar tragedies. Qamar is of course deeply traumatised – regular sounds of bombings only add to that – and there are no prosthetics in Gaza. As heartbreaking as it is, Qamar’s story is far from unique. And right now, it’s being repeated.
https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/gazas-children-trapped-cycle-pain
All of that to happen to a CHILD at hands of a “civilised democracy” with the alleged “most moral army in the world”, and almost the whole of the Western world today, standing with the supremacist/Zionist perpetrators in defiance of International Law & Human Rights?
HOW could this scenario be possible – if not for the likes of Robert Maxwell & Jeffrey Epstein and their CIA-MI6-MOSSAD connections?
Israel, United States: Confidential intel report shows US was concerned attorney Dershowitz had Mossad ties:
‘A close friend of Benjamin Netanyahu, lawyer Alan Dershowitz was reportedly on Israel’s list of candidates to defend it on charges of genocide before the ICJ. His past clients include Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, who the report suggested was a Mossad asset.’
Jeffrey Epstein was blackmailing politicians for Israel’s Mossad, new book claims
‘The claims are being made by the alleged former Israeli spy Ari Ben-Menashe in a soon-to-be-released book “Epstein: Dead Men Tell No Tales” in which he said that he was the handler of Ghislaine’s father Robert Maxwell, who was also an Israeli espionage agent and was the one who introduced his daughter and Epstein to Mossad.’
Jeffrey Epstein, Blackmail and a Lucrative ‘Hot List’
Robert Maxwell: Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir: “He has done more for Israel than can today be told.”
Ján Ludvík Hyman Binyamin Hoch was a British Zionist media mogul, member of parliament, Mossad operative and fraudster born in Czechoslovakia. He changed his name to Ian Robert Maxwell after migrating to the UK.
The UK public has good reason to be suspicious via past-case precedent on which, much of UK Law is grounded i.e. Katharine Gun who as translator for UK Intelligence, leaked a memo from US officials requesting ‘dirt’ to be found on key UN figures for specific purpose of blackmailing them into supporting invasion of Iraq; who’s being coerced into war today?
15 Years Later: How U.K. Whistleblower Katharine Gun Risked Everything to Leak Damning Iraq War Memo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWtIu7mbnbM&t=3s
We know for a fact via Brexit, that there are global & corporate ‘intelligence’ agencies deployed specifically to ‘find dirt’ on various officials in every nation for purpose of gaining covert control of powerful individuals and/or the nation itself via control of subsequently elected politicians:
Why the unfolding story of Cambridge Analytica matters
“Kenyan women giving birth in the streets in 2020, a criminal Hillary Clinton, £350 million extra per week to spend on public services in a UK outside the EU – all of this was put before us as fact and possibility, rather than the creation of a PR firm which may have been involved in illegal collection of data, disinformation, bribery and entrapment.”
https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/research/perspective/why-unfolding-cambridge-analytica-matters
Technological advances particularly in spyware, have dramatically altered this world and not least, through influence & power gained via knowledge of ‘secrets’ – leverage is a mighty tool and it appears the worst of those relying on such tactics, are literally cashing in. Such influence moves from strength to strength toward satisfying usually nefarious ‘goals’ i.e. Unregulated rollout of untested, experimental and potentially or actually dangerous technology that now includes, bio-technology.
With the artificial/factory-womb and genetically modified babies rapidly approaching global reality, those who understand and genuinely care for children, are righteously alarmed – we’re ignorantly dismissed as ‘Luddites’ (who were not against technology but that it was allowed to leave them to starve); on that same point in relation to the impacts of technology on all and particularly human life, as a sane species we naturally, think first for the children – the future generations to be born into the world we are all somehow, ‘contracted’ into building this day.
Examining the foundations and those standing at the helm waving their ‘blueprints’ as alleged ‘stakeholders’ – it is UNTHINKABLE that a sane, intelligent, lawful & righteous species could so casually hand complete reproductive control into the hands of any such deeply maligned consciousness; the very people who, only have such technology to begin with because they profited from every kind of crime and cruelty to children.
They watched Africa starve while their bank balances grew fat on her resources. People who gather around men like Epstein, for the drugs, the women, the men, the boys, the girls and the babies.
‘Israel’s surveillance industry is thoroughly integrated within the global market. Governments seeking to enhance their control through technology with invasive capacities are eager consumers of Israeli [surveillance] products, which, in turn, gives Israel diplomatic leverage over those governments…
‘India, too, signed a two-billion-dollar deal with Israel in 2017 to acquire missile systems and licensing for Pegasus. In exchange, India voted in Israel’s favor in 2019 at the UN’s Economic and Social Council to deny observer status to a Palestinian human rights organization. The Modi government has used Pegasus to fabricate evidence against journalists on charges of terrorism.’
It appears, the EU are ahead of the game and has introduced laws against misuse of AI, which, could easily be deployed to target & groom children – naturally, being now “liberated” from the EU, British people it seems, will simply rely on our sovereignty to protect us:
‘EU AI Act: first regulation on artificial intelligence’
Unacceptable risk
‘Unacceptable risk AI systems are systems considered a threat to people and will be banned. They include:
- Cognitive behavioural manipulation of people or specific vulnerable groups: for example voice-activated toys that encourage dangerous behaviour in children
- Social scoring: classifying people based on behaviour, socio-economic status or personal characteristics
- Biometric identification and categorisation of people
- Real-time and remote biometric identification systems, such as facial recognition
CSA directives therefore, do need to take absolute priority over every other issue and that does include, introducing strict legislation on all AI & bio-technology and, on who controls it – offensive technology can and must be lawfully monitored because in the hands of the wrong people, AI & Bio-Tech are a weapon of war and another tool of power for predators:
The Gospel’: how Israel uses AI to select bombing targets in Gaza
Do UK MPs have any real awareness about what AI is capable of?
AI Researchers STUNNED as Claude Hires a Darkweb ‘Hitman’…
The bottom line is, our world is lawfully suspected to be usurped to the command of coercive & malicious criminals, who also rely on threats & bribery; it appears they want WW3 as a cover for fulfilling the criminally devised ‘Greater Israel Project’ – i.e. What Mossad-Epstein’s covert-CSA-Child-Trafficking-op’s have directly ‘earned’ for Israel i.e. The alleged ‘right’ to do as they please:
The Zionist Plan for the Greater Israel by dividing Middle East: Oded Yinon Plan:
‘The document being reproduced here pertaining to the formation of “Greater Israel” constitutes the cornerstone of powerful Zionist political parties, as well as within the Israeli military and intelligence-establishment. According to the founding father of Zionism Theodore Herzl, “the area of the Jewish State stretches “from the Brook of Egypt to the Euphrates.” According to Rabbi Fischmann, “the Promised Land extends from the River of Egypt up to the Euphrates, it includes parts of Syria and Lebanon“.’
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1678895630?sourcetype=Trade%20Journals
Middle East Monitor: Israel declares it is above the law
‘Documents published this week shows a legal representative of the Israeli government audaciously claiming that Israel can “legislate anywhere in the world,” that it is “entitled to violate the sovereignty of foreign countries,” and that it “is allowed to ignore the directives of international law in any field it desires”.
https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20180921-israel-declares-it-is-above-the-law/
Israel is a refuge for Jewish dual-citizen CSA sex offenders, who can flee there for protection from arrest & charges:
How Jewish-American pedophiles hide from justice in Israel
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/how-jewish-american-pedophiles-hide-from-justice-in-israel/
In 2019, soon after Corbyn was toppled by from the Labour Party Leadership, ‘The Times of Israel’ celebrated his replacement and describing yourself Sir Starmer PM, as a ‘Zionist with a Jewish Wife’ – if what Israel’s been engaged in against the people & children of Palestine, is ‘Zionism’, then it can have no place in UK Parliament because as a pseudo-religious-political ideology, Zionism amounts to an open attack against democracy, human rights, and Common & International Law.
Zionism and Apartheid: The Negation of Human Rights:
After Corbyn, UK Labour elects Keir Starmer, Zionist with Jewish wife, as leader
‘New opposition chief immediately apologizes to Jews for anti-Semitism in ranks, vows to ‘tear out this poison’ [evict socialist Jews from Labour]; his wife comes from a Jewish family, has relatives in Tel Aviv.’
Meet The Wrong Type of Jew, The Media Doesn’t Want You To Know Exists | Naomi Wimborne-Idrissi
How long before its British teenagers being dragged from their homes to go fight Russia, Iran etc, and for what valid reason exactly, when it’s a Zionist controlled UK Government & Parliament that poses the biggest threat against UK citizens, and most especially, for consistently orchestrating war & tension throughout the Middle East and now, in Europe too?
The Times of Israel: Why are US ‘pro-Israel’ groups boosting a far-right, anti-Muslim UK extremist?
Is it any surprise that UK CPD guidelines penned by an alleged ‘Zionist’ are not fit for purpose and are effectively, a mere pretence of doing something while providing more options to do nothing: Are British children, being majorly non-Zionist, now on a par with the children of Palestine & Ukraine = Expendable?
Ukraine’s teenage boys fear a dark dilemma: Fight or run
‘More than 190,000 Ukrainian boys aged between 14 and 17 have registered for temporary protected status in European Union countries since the conflict began, according to EU data, among millions of people who have fled the country.’
According to my lived experience and research, Britain is a nation governed by the mentality of my ‘dad’ – a mentally-imbalanced, lying, misogynist, racist, gambler-alcoholic, wife & child battering, rapist, thief, and paedophile: THAT is what Britain raised for a British ‘father’ by way of intergenerational, negative, social conditioning (coupled with failure to diagnose and/or treat mental health issues), which, continues to spew its vile hatred and abuse against the poor, the immigrant, the woman, the Black, the LGTBQ, the child, the Muslim, the Jew – and THAT is what we need to erase from our collective, social consciousness by way of righteousness, amnesty, kindness, care, compassion & forgiveness, and, by way of investigation, arrests, prosecution and psychiatric therapy.
Not only was my Dad’s family & community robbed of the caring & righteous man he ought to have been – he too was robbed of his right and ability to enjoy his own family life: Why are so many British males (and increasingly, females too), continuing to suffer the same debilitating psychological & emotional burdens and trauma that incite them to enact violent & abusive patterns against their own families, when we know full well both the cause and the cure?
Given the obstacles, it’s a credit to the inherent goodness of humanity that there are so many genuinely loving and caring parents, who work hard and struggle to give the very best of life to their children, many of whom, develop into equally balanced adults, and yet, there are also too many who fall victim to abuse, crime & addiction despite their parent’s best efforts and precisely because UK society is based on economically & socially enforced abuse in denial of UK citizens Human Rights i.e. Every homeless person in Britain has been denied their basic Human Right to shelter.
It is time to halt the insidious flow of negative social conditioning born through the ongoing myth of “meritocracy” and all of its related social judgements that continue to eat their way into the living consciousness of every generation, inflicting anxiety, dependency, confusion and emotional & psychological dis-ease and dis-order:
Psychiatric disorders among men voluntarily in treatment for violent behaviour: a cross-sectional study
‘Violent behaviour has been linked to a variety of mental health symptomatologies such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD),10–12 personality disorders,13 ,14 alcohol problems,15–17 anxiety disorders,18 depression,19 schizophrenia and other psychoses.20 ,21 Conversely, severe domestic violence is prevalent among psychiatric inpatients.22 It is well known that relative to non-violent men, men who use violence typically display higher levels of substance abuse,23 ,24 elevated scores on personality pathology25–28 and depressive symptoms.29 ,30 Of the men in therapy for violent behaviour, those with borderline or antisocial personality traits have been shown to exert more severe physical, psychological and sexual violence.31 Furthermore, men with PTSD have been shown to display more aggressive behaviour than those without PTSD.5’
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/4/4/e004485
The common consensus that it’s; ‘only the children of powerless and socially denigrated parents, who are suffering and they don’t really count for much anyway…’ is an anathema we today have witnessed blatantly operating against the children of Palestine – and, is it not the case that directly due to UK government’s lax & ignorant attitudes to British children, UK Parliament could so casually put Israel’s alleged ‘right’ as an illegal and brutal occupying force, to ‘defend itself’, above and beyond the rights of Palestinian children to be defended by their Human Rights & International Law?
EVERY CHILD IS A MOST IMPORTANT PERSON/MIP – as a species we simply cannot afford to think of a child in any other way i.e. The legal term ‘minor’ reflects an antiquated judgement against children as unimportant/insignificant human beings and is effectively, a psychological word-spell programming people from childhood, to trivialise concerns around child welfare – that judgement/legal definition of a child needs to be scrapped.
Meanwhile, we do need to get with a more comprehensive and deeper understanding on the full spectrum of CSA crimes:
A new typology of child sexual abuse offending
‘The typology sets outs nine types of child sexual abuse. It should be noted that there is no implied sense of hierarchy in the presentation of the types; and that, although there are overlaps between different types, each type seeks to describe a specific context that comprises a set of behaviours and features that define a particular type of abuse.’
Only the law and our rights can deliver the change we need, and only so long as there are people with courage to stand by those laws & rights that truly act to protect children. We cannot successfully defend ourselves or our nation from either internal tyranny nor external threat, until, we’re sure as can be, our children’s safety is granted priority under protection of stringently enforced EU-style CPDs within a nation, diligently committed to combatting all forms of child suffering and CSA.
Britain needs positive and lasting change of the kind that will endeavour to ensure every child residing in or entering into this country, receives the respect, love & care they deserve as their universal human right: Economic, national & international policy that harms children can no longer be tolerated.
I leave you with the memory of Hind Rajab – her tragic fate epitomises how state-imposed apartheid & propaganda against a subjugated and denigrated social group, can and does manifest into a sadistically maligned sense of ‘righteousness’ to commit crime with impunity against the officially designated scapegoats:
Israeli military deliberately targeted and killed the medics who went to rescue Hind, and then mercilessly shot 300 bullets into her body knowing full well she was a frightened and defenceless child;
‘…alone in the blood-soaked car, surrounded by the bodies of her loved ones. Her desperate cries for help, as she begged for rescue on the phone with emergency services, moved hearts around the world. The ambulance that was sent to save her, after hours of negotiation, was obliterated by the Israeli army, ensuring that Hind’s life was cruelly and deliberately extinguished.’
The Hind Rajab Foundation: https://www.hindrajabfoundation.org/
A world run by child abusers and their cohorts is a world that promotes war, poverty, greed, and condones genocide – certainly, UK Parliament appears keen to turn Britain into a war zone asap: Our children don’t need bombs & bullets what children need are righteous adults who stand by the law and human rights, and who will not take ‘no’ for answer when it comes to child welfare, rights & safety.
“Children are the world’s most valuable resource and its best hope for the future.” President John F. Kennedy
I sincerely hope this discourse on Britain’s child protection protocols and the socio-political & economic issues surrounding CSA & CSE, will be a wake-up call for both UK Parliament and its electorate.
Kind Regards,
A Survivor.
Artemis Works 
Leave a reply to Karate With Words | debdahvibez Cancel reply